Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Pulse_policy_secure
(Pulsesecure)Repositories |
Unknown: This might be proprietary software. |
#Vulnerabilities | 32 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019-04-26 | CVE-2019-11543 | XSS exists in the admin web console in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, and 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 6.1 | ||
2019-04-26 | CVE-2019-11540 | In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 9.8 | ||
2017-08-29 | CVE-2017-11455 | diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to start tcpdump, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 8.8 | ||
2019-06-03 | CVE-2019-11509 | In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.1R15.1, 5.2 before 5.2R12.1, 5.3 before 5.3R15.1, 5.4 before 5.4R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.2, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Incorrect Access Control to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | Connect_secure, Policy_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 8.8 | ||
2018-09-06 | CVE-2018-14366 | download.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX before 8.1R13 and 8.3RX before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure through 5.2RX before 5.2R10 and 5.4RX before 5.4R4 have an Open Redirect Vulnerability. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 6.1 | ||
2018-09-06 | CVE-2018-6320 | A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 9.8 | ||
2019-04-26 | CVE-2019-11539 | In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, the admin web interface allows an authenticated attacker to inject and execute commands. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 7.2 | ||
2019-04-26 | CVE-2019-11542 | In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | Connect_secure, Pulse_connect_secure, Pulse_policy_secure | 7.2 | ||
2019-06-19 | CVE-2019-11477 | Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | Ubuntu_linux, Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_fraud_protection_service, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Traffix_signaling_delivery_controller, Connect_secure, Linux_kernel, Pulse_policy_secure, Pulse_secure_virtual_application_delivery_controller, Enterprise_linux, Enterprise_linux_atomic_host, Enterprise_linux_aus, Enterprise_linux_eus, Enterprise_mrg | 7.5 | ||
2019-06-19 | CVE-2019-11478 | Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | Ubuntu_linux, Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_fraud_protection_service, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Traffix_signaling_delivery_controller, Connect_secure, Linux_kernel, Pulse_policy_secure, Pulse_secure_virtual_application_delivery_controller, Enterprise_linux, Enterprise_linux_atomic_host, Enterprise_linux_aus, Enterprise_linux_eus, Enterprise_mrg | 7.5 |