Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Wolfssl
(Wolfssl)Repositories | https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl |
#Vulnerabilities | 56 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-01-22 | CVE-2015-7744 | wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack. | Mariadb, Leap, Opensuse, Wolfssl | 5.9 | ||
2019-05-23 | CVE-2019-11873 | wolfSSL 4.0.0 has a Buffer Overflow in DoPreSharedKeys in tls13.c when a current identity size is greater than a client identity size. An attacker sends a crafted hello client packet over the network to a TLSv1.3 wolfSSL server. The length fields of the packet: record length, client hello length, total extensions length, PSK extension length, total identity length, and identity length contain their maximum value which is 2^16. The identity data field of the PSK extension of the packet... | Wolfssl | 9.8 | ||
2020-04-12 | CVE-2020-11713 | wolfSSL 4.3.0 has mulmod code in wc_ecc_mulmod_ex in ecc.c that does not properly resist timing side-channel attacks. | Wolfssl | 7.5 | ||
2019-12-11 | CVE-2019-14317 | wolfSSL and wolfCrypt 4.1.0 and earlier (formerly known as CyaSSL) generate biased DSA nonces. This allows a remote attacker to compute the long term private key from several hundred DSA signatures via a lattice attack. The issue occurs because dsa.c fixes two bits of the generated nonces. | Wolfssl | 5.3 | ||
2019-12-25 | CVE-2019-19962 | wolfSSL before 4.3.0 mishandles calls to wc_SignatureGenerateHash, leading to fault injection in RSA cryptography. | Wolfssl | 7.5 | ||
2020-06-25 | CVE-2020-11735 | The private-key operations in ecc.c in wolfSSL before 4.4.0 do not use a constant-time modular inverse when mapping to affine coordinates, aka a "projective coordinates leak." | Wolfssl | 5.3 | ||
2020-08-21 | CVE-2020-12457 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service. | Wolfssl | 7.5 | ||
2020-01-28 | CVE-2014-2898 | wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via multiple calls to the CyaSSL_read function which triggers an out-of-bounds read when an error occurs, related to not checking the return code and MAC verification failure. | Wolfssl | N/A | ||
2020-01-28 | CVE-2014-2897 | The SSL 3 HMAC functionality in wolfSSL CyaSSL 2.5.0 before 2.9.4 does not check the padding length when verification fails, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted HMAC, which triggers an out-of-bounds read. | Wolfssl | N/A | ||
2020-01-28 | CVE-2014-2896 | The DoAlert function in the (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact and vectors, which trigger memory corruption or an out-of-bounds read. | Wolfssl | N/A |