Product:

Dnsmasq

(Thekelleys)
Repositories

Unknown:

This might be proprietary software.
#Vulnerabilities 37
Date Id Summary Products Score Patch Annotated
2022-01-01 CVE-2021-45953 Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge. Dnsmasq 9.8
2022-01-01 CVE-2021-45954 Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from answer_auth and FuzzAuth). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge. Dnsmasq 9.8
2022-01-01 CVE-2021-45955 Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge." However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed Dnsmasq 9.8
2022-01-01 CVE-2021-45956 Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in print_mac (called from log_packet and dhcp_reply). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge. Dnsmasq 9.8
2022-01-01 CVE-2021-45957 Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in answer_request (called from FuzzAnswerTheRequest and fuzz_rfc1035.c). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge. Dnsmasq 9.8
2022-08-29 CVE-2022-0934 A single-byte, non-arbitrary write/use-after-free flaw was found in dnsmasq. This flaw allows an attacker who sends a crafted packet processed by dnsmasq, potentially causing a denial of service. Enterprise_linux, Dnsmasq 7.5
2023-03-15 CVE-2023-28450 An issue was discovered in Dnsmasq before 2.90. The default maximum EDNS.0 UDP packet size was set to 4096 but should be 1232 because of DNS Flag Day 2020. Dnsmasq 7.5
2024-02-14 CVE-2023-50387 Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with many DNSKEY and RRSIG records, the protocol specification implies that an algorithm must evaluate all combinations of DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Fedora, Bind, Windows_server_2008, Windows_server_2012, Windows_server_2016, Windows_server_2019, Windows_server_2022, Windows_server_2022_23h2, Knot_resolver, Unbound, Recursor, Enterprise_linux, Dnsmasq 7.5
2024-06-06 CVE-2023-49441 dnsmasq 2.9 is vulnerable to Integer Overflow via forward_query. Dnsmasq 7.5
2005-05-02 CVE-2005-0877 Dnsmasq before 2.21 allows remote attackers to poison the DNS cache via answers to queries that were not made by Dnsmasq. Dnsmasq 7.5