Product:

Micollab

(Mitel)
Repositories git://git.openssl.org/openssl.git
#Vulnerabilities 34
Date Id Summary Products Score Patch Annotated
2024-10-21 CVE-2024-30157 A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations. Micollab 7.2
2024-10-21 CVE-2024-30158 A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a SQL Injection attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary database and management operations. Micollab 7.2
2024-10-21 CVE-2024-30159 A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts. Micollab 4.8
2024-10-21 CVE-2024-30160 A vulnerability in the Suite Applications Services component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.7.1.110 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation of user input. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts. Micollab 4.8
2014-04-07 CVE-2014-0160 Heartbleed - The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Symantec_messaging_gateway, Ubuntu_linux, Debian_linux, Fedora, Filezilla_server, V100_firmware, V60_firmware, Micollab, Mivoice, Openssl, Opensuse, Enterprise_linux_desktop, Enterprise_linux_server, Enterprise_linux_server_aus, Enterprise_linux_server_eus, Enterprise_linux_server_tus, Enterprise_linux_workstation, Gluster_storage, Storage, Virtualization, S9922l_firmware, Application_processing_engine_firmware, Cp_1543\-1_firmware, Elan\-8\.2, Simatic_s7\-1500_firmware, Simatic_s7\-1500t_firmware, Wincc_open_architecture, Splunk 7.5
2022-03-10 CVE-2022-26143 The TP-240 (aka tp240dvr) component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.4 SP1 FP1 and MiVoice Business Express through 8.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service (performance degradation and excessive outbound traffic). This was exploited in the wild in February and March 2022 for the TP240PhoneHome DDoS attack. Micollab, Mivoice_business_express 9.8
2022-11-22 CVE-2022-41326 The web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.0.13 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary scripts due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow remote code execution within the context of the application. Micollab 9.8
2023-04-14 CVE-2023-25597 A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.2.9 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to download a shared file via a crafted request - including the exact path and filename - due to improper authentication control. A successful exploit could allow access to sensitive information. Micollab 5.9
2022-10-25 CVE-2022-36452 A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload malicious files. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application. Micollab 9.8
2022-10-25 CVE-2022-36451 A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server. Micollab 8.8