Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager
(F5)Repositories | https://github.com/torvalds/linux |
#Vulnerabilities | 431 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019-11-01 | CVE-2019-6657 | On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also known as the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_fraud_protection_service, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator | N/A | ||
2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-6160 | In F5 BIG-IP AAM and PEM software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.4.1 to 11.5.4, a remote attacker may create maliciously crafted HTTP request to cause Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to restart and temporarily fail to process traffic. This issue is exposed on virtual servers using a Policy Enforcement profile or a Web Acceleration profile. Systems that do not have BIG-IP AAM module provisioned are not vulnerable. The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) may restart and... | Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager | 5.9 | ||
2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-6159 | F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1 are vulnerable to a denial of service attack when the MPTCP option is enabled on a virtual server. Data plane is vulnerable when using the MPTCP option of a TCP profile. There is no control plane exposure. An attacker may be able to disrupt services by causing TMM to restart hence temporarily failing to process traffic. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_websafe | 5.9 | ||
2018-04-13 | CVE-2017-6158 | In F5 BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 there is a vulnerability in TMM related to handling of invalid IP addresses. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Big\-Ip_websafe | 6.5 | ||
2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-6157 | In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM and Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.5.0 - 11.5.4, virtual servers with a configuration using the HTTP Explicit Proxy functionality and/or SOCKS profile are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, remote attack that allows modification of BIG-IP system configuration, extraction of sensitive system files, and/or possible remote command execution on the BIG-IP system. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_websafe | 8.1 | ||
2018-04-13 | CVE-2017-6156 | When the F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.1, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system is configured with a wildcard IPSec tunnel endpoint, it may allow a remote attacker to disrupt or impersonate the tunnels that have completed phase 1 IPSec negotiations. The attacker must possess the necessary credentials to negotiate the phase 1 of the IPSec exchange to exploit this vulnerability; in many environment this limits the attack surface to other endpoints under the same administration. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Big\-Ip_websafe | 6.4 | ||
2018-04-13 | CVE-2017-6155 | On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.2, 11.4.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, malformed SPDY or HTTP/2 requests may result in a disruption of service to TMM. Data plane is only exposed when a SPDY or HTTP/2 profile is attached to a virtual server. There is no control plane exposure. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_protocol_security_module, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Big\-Ip_websafe | 7.5 | ||
2018-06-01 | CVE-2017-6153 | Features in F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system that utilizes inflate functionality directly, via an iRule, or via the inflate code from PEM module are subjected to a service disruption via a "Zip Bomb" attack. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_fraud_protection_service, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator | 5.3 | ||
2017-12-21 | CVE-2017-6151 | In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator and WebSafe software version 13.0.0, undisclosed requests made to BIG-IP virtual servers which make use of the "HTTP/2 profile" may result in a disruption of service to TMM. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_dns, Big\-Ip_edge_gateway, Big\-Ip_global_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_webaccelerator, Big\-Ip_websafe | 7.5 | ||
2017-09-18 | CVE-2017-6147 | In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM, and WebSafe 12.1.2-HF1 and 13.0.0, an undisclosed type of responses may cause TMM to restart, causing an interruption of service when "SSL Forward Proxy" setting is enabled in both the Client and Server SSL profiles assigned to a BIG-IP Virtual Server. | Big\-Ip_access_policy_manager, Big\-Ip_advanced_firewall_manager, Big\-Ip_analytics, Big\-Ip_application_acceleration_manager, Big\-Ip_application_security_manager, Big\-Ip_domain_name_system, Big\-Ip_link_controller, Big\-Ip_local_traffic_manager, Big\-Ip_policy_enforcement_manager, Big\-Ip_websafe | 5.9 |