Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Debian_linux
(Debian)Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-09-21 | CVE-2020-6571 | Insufficient data validation in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 85.0.4183.83 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via IDN homographs via a crafted domain name. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Chrome, Backports_sle, Leap | 4.3 | ||
2020-09-21 | CVE-2020-6573 | Use after free in video in Google Chrome on Android prior to 85.0.4183.102 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Chrome, Backports_sle, Leap | 9.6 | ||
2020-09-21 | CVE-2020-6574 | Insufficient policy enforcement in installer in Google Chrome on OS X prior to 85.0.4183.102 allowed a local attacker to potentially achieve privilege escalation via a crafted binary. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Chrome, Backports_sle, Leap | 7.8 | ||
2020-09-21 | CVE-2020-6575 | Race in Mojo in Google Chrome prior to 85.0.4183.102 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Chrome, Backports_sle, Leap | 8.3 | ||
2020-09-21 | CVE-2020-6576 | Use after free in offscreen canvas in Google Chrome prior to 85.0.4183.102 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Chrome, Backports_sle, Leap | 8.8 | ||
2020-09-23 | CVE-2020-25595 | An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. The PCI passthrough code improperly uses register data. Code paths in Xen's MSI handling have been identified that act on unsanitized values read back from device hardware registers. While devices strictly compliant with PCI specifications shouldn't be able to affect these registers, experience shows that it's very common for devices to have out-of-spec "backdoor" operations that can affect the result of these reads. A not fully trusted guest... | Debian_linux, Fedora, Leap, Xen | 7.8 | ||
2020-09-23 | CVE-2020-25596 | An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. This causes the guest kernel to observe a kernel-privilege #GP fault (typically fatal) rather than a user-privilege #GP fault (usually converted into SIGSEGV/etc.). Malicious or buggy userspace can... | Debian_linux, Fedora, Leap, Xen | 5.5 | ||
2020-09-23 | CVE-2020-25599 | An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are evtchn_reset() race conditions. Uses of EVTCHNOP_reset (potentially by a guest on itself) or XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset (by itself covered by XSA-77) can lead to the violation of various internal assumptions. This may lead to out of bounds memory accesses or triggering of bug checks. In particular, x86 PV guests may be able to elevate their privilege to that of the host. Host and guest crashes are also possible, leading to a Denial of... | Debian_linux, Fedora, Leap, Xen | 7.0 | ||
2020-09-23 | CVE-2020-25600 | An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains can use only 1023 channels, due to limited space in their shared (between guest and Xen) information structure, whereas all other domains can use up to 4095 in this model. The recording of the... | Debian_linux, Fedora, Leap, Xen | 5.5 | ||
2020-09-23 | CVE-2020-25601 | An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is a lack of preemption in evtchn_reset() / evtchn_destroy(). In particular, the FIFO event channel model allows guests to have a large number of event channels active at a time. Closing all of these (when resetting all event channels or when cleaning up after the guest) may take extended periods of time. So far, there was no arrangement for preemption at suitable intervals, allowing a CPU to spend an almost unbounded amount of time in the... | Debian_linux, Fedora, Leap, Xen | 5.5 |