Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Spark
(Apache)Repositories |
Unknown: This might be proprietary software. |
#Vulnerabilities | 19 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-06-23 | CVE-2020-9480 | In Apache Spark 2.4.5 and earlier, a standalone resource manager's master may be configured to require authentication (spark.authenticate) via a shared secret. When enabled, however, a specially-crafted RPC to the master can succeed in starting an application's resources on the Spark cluster, even without the shared key. This can be leveraged to execute shell commands on the host machine. This does not affect Spark clusters using other resource managers (YARN, Mesos, etc). | Spark, Business_intelligence | 9.8 | ||
2021-02-26 | CVE-2020-27223 | In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.6.v20170531 to 9.4.36.v20210114 (inclusive), 10.0.0, and 11.0.0 when Jetty handles a request containing multiple Accept headers with a large number of “quality” (i.e. q) parameters, the server may enter a denial of service (DoS) state due to high CPU usage processing those quality values, resulting in minutes of CPU time exhausted processing those quality values. | Nifi, Solr, Spark, Debian_linux, Jetty, E\-Series_santricity_os_controller, E\-Series_santricity_web_services, Element_plug\-In_for_vcenter_server, Hci, Hci_management_node, Management_services_for_element_software, Snap_creator_framework, Snapcenter, Snapmanager, Solidfire, Rest_data_services | 5.3 | ||
2022-07-18 | CVE-2022-33891 | The Apache Spark UI offers the possibility to enable ACLs via the configuration option spark.acls.enable. With an authentication filter, this checks whether a user has access permissions to view or modify the application. If ACLs are enabled, a code path in HttpSecurityFilter can allow someone to perform impersonation by providing an arbitrary user name. A malicious user might then be able to reach a permission check function that will ultimately build a Unix shell command based on their... | Spark | 8.8 | ||
2023-04-17 | CVE-2023-22946 | In Apache Spark versions prior to 3.4.0, applications using spark-submit can specify a 'proxy-user' to run as, limiting privileges. The application can execute code with the privileges of the submitting user, however, by providing malicious configuration-related classes on the classpath. This affects architectures relying on proxy-user, for example those using Apache Livy to manage submitted applications. Update to Apache Spark 3.4.0 or later, and ensure that... | Spark | 9.9 | ||
2019-11-18 | CVE-2019-10172 | A flaw was found in org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl:1.9.x libraries. XML external entity vulnerabilities similar CVE-2016-3720 also affects codehaus jackson-mapper-asl libraries but in different classes. | Spark, Debian_linux, Jackson\-Mapper\-Asl, Jboss_enterprise_application_platform, Jboss_fuse | 7.5 | ||
2022-03-10 | CVE-2021-38296 | Apache Spark supports end-to-end encryption of RPC connections via "spark.authenticate" and "spark.network.crypto.enabled". In versions 3.1.2 and earlier, it uses a bespoke mutual authentication protocol that allows for full encryption key recovery. After an initial interactive attack, this would allow someone to decrypt plaintext traffic offline. Note that this does not affect security mechanisms controlled by "spark.authenticate.enableSaslEncryption", "spark.io.encryption.enabled",... | Spark, Financial_services_crime_and_compliance_management_studio | 7.5 | ||
2022-11-01 | CVE-2022-31777 | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Spark 3.2.1 and earlier, and 3.3.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the web browser of a user, by including a malicious payload into the logs which would be returned in logs rendered in the UI. | Spark | 5.4 | ||
2017-07-12 | CVE-2017-7678 | In Apache Spark before 2.2.0, it is possible for an attacker to take advantage of a user's trust in the server to trick them into visiting a link that points to a shared Spark cluster and submits data including MHTML to the Spark master, or history server. This data, which could contain a script, would then be reflected back to the user and could be evaluated and executed by MS Windows-based clients. It is not an attack on Spark itself, but on the user, who may then execute the script... | Spark | 6.1 | ||
2017-09-13 | CVE-2017-12612 | In Apache Spark 1.6.0 until 2.1.1, the launcher API performs unsafe deserialization of data received by its socket. This makes applications launched programmatically using the launcher API potentially vulnerable to arbitrary code execution by an attacker with access to any user account on the local machine. It does not affect apps run by spark-submit or spark-shell. The attacker would be able to execute code as the user that ran the Spark application. Users are encouraged to update to... | Spark | 7.8 |